What IS God?

• Jacqueline Guerrero hey, I just summarized my conception of God
  

  about a minute ago · 
• 
  

  Jacqueline Guerrero Him: Oh I made a new self discovery with god
  
  Me: ?
  
  Him: A god can exist, if he exists outside of morals
  as in morals don't apply to him
  morals would be created for us, so that we could survive
  so what applies to us wouldn't apply to him
  
  Me: yup
  morals are irrelevant
  
  Him: so not tampering with shit, would make sense
  
  Me: there's just actuality
  also
  bias doesn't exist
  like in truth
  there is no connotation
  so any positives or negatives
  would simply be something humans attribute
  in all respects
  same with definitions
  which means meaning
  and ultimately, purpose
  when you extrapolate on that concept
  absolute neutrality, leaving complete potential for things to go in any direction
  
  Him: is god neutral then?
  neither good nor evil?
  honestly that would make the most sense
  
  Me: yup
  that's the truth
  now think about all potential that could ever happen
  it could be symbolized by random, correct?
  which could be symbolically represented by Pi
  and starting at a random place on Pi
  
  Me: you follow so far, right?
  
  Him: yup
  
  Me: okay, so
  then imagine 1 symbolizing a whole
  a whole system
  or geometrically
  a circle
  imagine the circumference of that circle determines the length before a strand of Pi resolves and a new sequence starts
  when it meets the start point again
  now imaging the midpoint is determined by the radius, or the diameter crossing through
  the center before the resolve
  imagine there are many circles symbolizing each individual even changing
  each being a whole representation
  each of a varying size
  the only thing that remains consistent regardless of the length of the circumference
  or the location of the midpoint in consequence
  would be Pi
  like in the equation
  therefore throughout all events
  and all change
  if there is a system
  even if the product of that system is an unknown variable
  the thing that makes that system a constant is the consist proportion, or Pi
  *consistent
  and if you imagine the constant as being consistent
  you can liken pi to the yet to be manifested potential
  that already is
  the point between the recession and expansion in the big bang
  would be the point where a new sequence begins
  or in present time
  where each individual perceived difference occurs
  despite the fact that there is a constant
  Pi could be considered a binding principle between the known and unknown
  the then, now, and to be
  validating them all
  hence it's a transcendental number
  it transcends the system, because it denotes the limits of the system
  and that's God
  
  Me: and we are Pi, since we are the consciousness that binds the two aspects of duality
  that aren't really true, but appear that way
  prolonged consciousness, that fluctuates, but remains
  not in one place at one time, either
  hence the higgs boson
  and why empiricism is doomed to collapse in on itself should physicists come to the same conclusion and be able to prove it or symbolize it logically
  as I just did
  the reason they can't consistently identify the God particle
  is because the God particle isn't consistent
  XD
  and I've known this and just kind of have been laughing to myself
  because essentially
  their lack of theory will make them look like dumbasses, once their ego centric arguments eventually fail
  that's the reconciliation between spirituality and the physical
  mediated through logic
  see, oneness is what spiritual strives to understand the nature of
  meditation promotes introversion, which promotes concepts connecting
  as they do during dreams
  so yes, while it is abstract and subconscious more often than not
  meditation is actually a great way to increase you understanding of the nature of reality
  

  a few seconds ago ·