Jacqueline Guerrero http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antireductionism
Irony. Cite it here. Btw,this is such anti-mainstream cutting edge scientific theory,it's not even taught in class yet. And it's only now being discovered and applied by a select few. Oh yeah,I also discovered the theory through my own means of logic without ever having heard of it,and I discovered it on google by knowing the definition before I knew the term. Harharhar...
Heck yeah,look who's sticking it to the bell-curve >:D
Not to mention,all my theorizing has been based on this sense I was like..4... So,um,I think I have a slight advantage to modern day theorists,because I uh..you know..never had to learn how to think differently and saw everything through this perspective anyway? The only difficultly is the process of objective description through a consistent type of explanation that couldn't be misconstrued and justified by ambiguous form. I was thinking math would be a good path,so I've been teaching myself calculus by thoroughly studying the syntax of the English language since.. well,since at very least last year....
I see everything like calculus because I understand how every variable of life/perception is connected. I see how everything,all perceived difference,is illusion and truth simulataneously,and how the collective output of the system of reality.. is neutral. We exist in change in neutrality. Also,4D is the absense of perceptual difference,and total and complete acceptance that all truth is illusion as truth= reality,reality=perception,perception=bias,and bias=focusing on particulars through discimination.
4D would be the next step:
focusing on particulars through discrimination=not seeing the whole picture.. therefore.. focusing on particulars through discrimination=not seeing the whole truth.
which means that so long as perception exists,difference is perceived(though it is an illusion as it is truth in falsely subjective understanding),and so long as difference is perceived,full objective truth cannot be known. If full objective truth ever could be known,it would be in a state devoid of meaning and focus,and nothing would.. really make "sense" then,would it? We would not be able to give value to sensation(sensory bombardment and selective focus breakdown/maybe symptems of schizophrenia),and.. we would lapse back into some form of understanding.
Doesn't it make sense? We began knowing nothing,yet we knew everything.. and the truth is objective truth is consistent,regardless of subjective conditions.. the fact that we at one point did not know *cannot* be changed,as it was once a fact.. and in ways,it will always be a fact..but in the moment,we will never full understand it because we're outside of the same moment in which it actually WAS. And if it were to return,well,we would simply not know. This is why time is not consistent,perception is not persistent,and reality is not realistic. Time is perception of space,and space is the illusion that is the product of energy reactions. The self is the energy,the reactions produce the perception we experience,and so.. the self will never fade. The self,for all,is truly the same,when seperated from actions and physical matter itself,and may be regarded as the spirit,the holy,or human,spirit.. or "god". And so we were made in his image. We were made in his image because we reflected his image back to himself so that he would learn what he was through seeing through our eyes. God's purpose is also ours: to preserve the joys of meaning and to defend the perception of choice. After all.. without that perception of difference,what would both he,you,and I really be? None of us would know.. None of us could see...
We must fight to save the essence of the holy spirit,and the key characteristic of humanity that has helped us survive,like it would any animal,but has allowed us to understand the most: the meaning that would tell a mother why killing her baby on a whim when upset by its crying is a BAD thing.. The thing people in society today are becoming increasingly less sensitive to and willing themselves to become ever more ignorant of by closing their minds and hearts.. a defense mechanism of pain we'll inevitable experience,but we typically wouldn't know better than to blame our humanity for. With nuclear devastation in our wake, we must reconnect with what has prevented our own doom,lest we will it upon ourselves through choosing not to take the initiative on individual levels.. By choosing not to experience pain,we collectively destroy our ability to experience any joy,love,passion,any ambition,and any purpose.. this is rejecting God. This is rejecting our spirit and the fact of our humanity. I don't care what God you worship,but to deny truth,love,forgiveness,all the good of humanity,is no good service to anybody,and the quicker you stop deluding yourself,claiming to advocate some perverted form of martyrdom, the sooner we can transcend the pain of delusion within illusion. Our pain is by our own hands! Wake up people! Wake up now and see your choices;all the control you were never taught you had! You hold more power than you would have ever had otherwise realized. Every consequence comes with a reflecting attribute,and by your choice,you can see the positive in all inverse relations,accept it's no more true than the negative,yet still choose to value it despite that fact because this lie is the truest truth we could ever know!
POINT OF DISTORTION BETWEEN UNDERSTANDING AND COMMUNICATION.. AS EXPLAINED THROUGH PHYSICS/PSYCHOPSYCHICS
Distance=Rate x Time
perceived amount of space= distance= rate x time
perceived amount of space=perception of space(let's just call that "perception")
Perception=rate x time
time=perception/rate
rate=time/perception
rate=perceived degree of change(relative difference)
perceived degree of relative change in difference = speed of change
rate of change= (amount of)perception of space/relative perspective
degree of change=degree of space/relative degree of difference
[degree of space= degree of change x relative degree of difference]<--must be considered in terms of perception because it is a product of perception.
so..
Dp=Rp x Tp
and without the variable of perception,the variable of *bias/discrimination*,
none of the variables would exist in a real(objective) display of logic because we wouldn't perceive them existing. Since they are founded on subjective bias(perception), these things will be perceived differently to everybody, but to relative and equivalent extents(based on a sort of ratio)applicable strictly within their own modes of logic. This is why this type of logic can be understood.. yet it cannot universally be explained to be the same thing,technically. It can't be portrayed consistently in an objective way.. Not when it is fundamentally understood and experienced through subjective means.
The commonality that vaguely lets us come to understand each other is the proportional value..
Irony. Cite it here. Btw,this is such anti-mainstream cutting edge scientific theory,it's not even taught in class yet. And it's only now being discovered and applied by a select few. Oh yeah,I also discovered the theory through my own means of logic without ever having heard of it,and I discovered it on google by knowing the definition before I knew the term. Harharhar...
Heck yeah,look who's sticking it to the bell-curve >:D
Not to mention,all my theorizing has been based on this sense I was like..4... So,um,I think I have a slight advantage to modern day theorists,because I uh..you know..never had to learn how to think differently and saw everything through this perspective anyway? The only difficultly is the process of objective description through a consistent type of explanation that couldn't be misconstrued and justified by ambiguous form. I was thinking math would be a good path,so I've been teaching myself calculus by thoroughly studying the syntax of the English language since.. well,since at very least last year....
I see everything like calculus because I understand how every variable of life/perception is connected. I see how everything,all perceived difference,is illusion and truth simulataneously,and how the collective output of the system of reality.. is neutral. We exist in change in neutrality. Also,4D is the absense of perceptual difference,and total and complete acceptance that all truth is illusion as truth= reality,reality=perception,perception=bias,and bias=focusing on particulars through discimination.
4D would be the next step:
focusing on particulars through discrimination=not seeing the whole picture.. therefore.. focusing on particulars through discrimination=not seeing the whole truth.
which means that so long as perception exists,difference is perceived(though it is an illusion as it is truth in falsely subjective understanding),and so long as difference is perceived,full objective truth cannot be known. If full objective truth ever could be known,it would be in a state devoid of meaning and focus,and nothing would.. really make "sense" then,would it? We would not be able to give value to sensation(sensory bombardment and selective focus breakdown/maybe symptems of schizophrenia),and.. we would lapse back into some form of understanding.
Doesn't it make sense? We began knowing nothing,yet we knew everything.. and the truth is objective truth is consistent,regardless of subjective conditions.. the fact that we at one point did not know *cannot* be changed,as it was once a fact.. and in ways,it will always be a fact..but in the moment,we will never full understand it because we're outside of the same moment in which it actually WAS. And if it were to return,well,we would simply not know. This is why time is not consistent,perception is not persistent,and reality is not realistic. Time is perception of space,and space is the illusion that is the product of energy reactions. The self is the energy,the reactions produce the perception we experience,and so.. the self will never fade. The self,for all,is truly the same,when seperated from actions and physical matter itself,and may be regarded as the spirit,the holy,or human,spirit.. or "god". And so we were made in his image. We were made in his image because we reflected his image back to himself so that he would learn what he was through seeing through our eyes. God's purpose is also ours: to preserve the joys of meaning and to defend the perception of choice. After all.. without that perception of difference,what would both he,you,and I really be? None of us would know.. None of us could see...
We must fight to save the essence of the holy spirit,and the key characteristic of humanity that has helped us survive,like it would any animal,but has allowed us to understand the most: the meaning that would tell a mother why killing her baby on a whim when upset by its crying is a BAD thing.. The thing people in society today are becoming increasingly less sensitive to and willing themselves to become ever more ignorant of by closing their minds and hearts.. a defense mechanism of pain we'll inevitable experience,but we typically wouldn't know better than to blame our humanity for. With nuclear devastation in our wake, we must reconnect with what has prevented our own doom,lest we will it upon ourselves through choosing not to take the initiative on individual levels.. By choosing not to experience pain,we collectively destroy our ability to experience any joy,love,passion,any ambition,and any purpose.. this is rejecting God. This is rejecting our spirit and the fact of our humanity. I don't care what God you worship,but to deny truth,love,forgiveness,all the good of humanity,is no good service to anybody,and the quicker you stop deluding yourself,claiming to advocate some perverted form of martyrdom, the sooner we can transcend the pain of delusion within illusion. Our pain is by our own hands! Wake up people! Wake up now and see your choices;all the control you were never taught you had! You hold more power than you would have ever had otherwise realized. Every consequence comes with a reflecting attribute,and by your choice,you can see the positive in all inverse relations,accept it's no more true than the negative,yet still choose to value it despite that fact because this lie is the truest truth we could ever know!
POINT OF DISTORTION BETWEEN UNDERSTANDING AND COMMUNICATION.. AS EXPLAINED THROUGH PHYSICS/PSYCHOPSYCHICS
Distance=Rate x Time
perceived amount of space= distance= rate x time
perceived amount of space=perception of space(let's just call that "perception")
Perception=rate x time
time=perception/rate
rate=time/perception
rate=perceived degree of change(relative difference)
perceived degree of relative change in difference = speed of change
rate of change= (amount of)perception of space/relative perspective
degree of change=degree of space/relative degree of difference
[degree of space= degree of change x relative degree of difference]<--must be considered in terms of perception because it is a product of perception.
so..
Dp=Rp x Tp
and without the variable of perception,the variable of *bias/discrimination*,
none of the variables would exist in a real(objective) display of logic because we wouldn't perceive them existing. Since they are founded on subjective bias(perception), these things will be perceived differently to everybody, but to relative and equivalent extents(based on a sort of ratio)applicable strictly within their own modes of logic. This is why this type of logic can be understood.. yet it cannot universally be explained to be the same thing,technically. It can't be portrayed consistently in an objective way.. Not when it is fundamentally understood and experienced through subjective means.
The commonality that vaguely lets us come to understand each other is the proportional value..
No comments:
Post a Comment